Atsiliepimai
Aprašymas
There’s no shame in a continental philosopher saying they are a Marxist, but it’s almost impossible to admit to being an anarchist. Silently, perhaps even unknowingly, philosophical anarchism “borrows” its definition from political anarchism, but the two remain strangers to each other. What do Reiner Schürmann, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben and Jacques Rancière have in common? Each of them ascribed a determining ontological, ethical, or political value to anarchy – yet not a single one ever called themselves an “anarchist.” It is as if anarchism were unmentionable and had to be concealed, even though its critique of domination and of government is poached by the philosophers.EXTRA 20 % nuolaida
Kupono kodas: ENG20
Akcija baigiasi už 5d.17:35:04
Nuolaidos kodas galioja perkant nuo 10 €. Nuolaidos nesumuojamos.
Atsiliepimai